[LRUG] Mongrel

[Jon Lim]

Pen may be a viable alternative to Pound.
The localhost issues are a known "feature" of Pound.

On 23/11/06, Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:
> Our solution with Apache 2.0 was to put Pound in between Apache and the
> Mongrels.  It's a bit more complex, but I'm sure it would handle failover
> etc... slightly better.
>
> Altho' I think there's a problem with your rails app seeing everything
> coming from 127.0.0.1 - but that might be a config issue with passing some
> HTTP headers around through the stack.
>
> Muz
>
>
> On 23/11/06, Paul Hammond <mail at paranoidfish.org> wrote:
> > > Thought I'd break my long lurking silence to say that I've had much
> > > success with Apache 2.0 and Mongrel, using mod_proxy. Sure, you
> > > can't run multiple mongrel instances direct from Apache with plain
> > > 2.0, but you can use Pound to achieve the same effect.
> > >
> >
> > It's a bit of a hack, but it is possible to run multiple mongrels
> > behind apache 2.0:
> >
> > http://times.usefulinc.com/2006/09/13-mongrel-apache20
> >
> > It doesn't handle fail-over, but...
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > chat mailing list
> > chat at lrug.org
> > http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chat mailing list
> chat at lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>
>


-- 
http://www.snowblink.co.uk/