[LRUG] Stealth Group!?

[Robert McKinnon]

Thanks for the heads up Murray. And thanks Tom for defending our little
group's honour. While we were in stealth mode last year when we didn't
have space capacity for large meetings, definitely this year we've been
as open as possible, with the exception of posting to the ruby-talk
list.

I'll rectify that now. ;)

cheers,
Rob

--- Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is anyone following the "Chunky Bacon" / "Potential Brit ruby meeting
> formally Chunky Bacon" threads on ruby-talk? They are being all mean
> about LRUG being a "stealth" group (relevant bit from ruby-forum:
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/86060).  Tom has been kind enough to
> jump in and defend the LRUG honour, but one message in particular (
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/86060#159196) got me thinking.
> 
> Perhaps in the interest of un-stealthing we should send out [ANN]
> messages for LRUG meetings to the ruby-talk list?  Every other RUG
> seems to do it (and some even seem to use ruby-talk as their own
> chat at lrug.org style list)
> so it's not like we'd be out of place.
> 
> Muz

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com