[LRUG] Getting rid of 'proc'

[Peter Ferne]

On 17 Apr 2007, at 10:35, Paul Battley wrote:
> Following on from last night's discussion about the use of 'proc' in
> Paolo's TabNav plugin, here's a brief demonstration of how to evaluate
> the block in the right context without needing 'proc' at all:

Having missed the meeting I'm wondering how the discussion went. Is  
there a general presumption against the use of proc? Or is your  
alternative more by way of explanation of how proc works? Or  
something else altogether?
--
petef