[LRUG] In the grim darkness of the far future there is only alternative presentation formats

[David Salgado]

I think this is a great idea. I thought the rejectconf presentation
style was a lot of fun (how about "pikachoo session" for the name?).

If the date for the event is an issue, how about keeping up regular
LRUG sessions and taking submissions for the lightning talks in the
background until we have a "quorum" of nine, then making that the next
LRUG?

Cheers

David

On 17/10/2007, Tom Ward <tom at popdog.net> wrote:
> On 17/10/2007, Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This seems like a lark, as nothing makes a presentation more fun than having
> > to follow strict rules.  In our beery wisdom we decided that the February
> > meeting (11th Feb) would be the best time to do this, not December as there
> > could be parties or whatever and not January as folk might not be here or
> > still be unrecovered from Hogmanay excess.
>
> Are we not going to have another pub quiz in January?  I'll ask the
> questions if Murray or noone else wants to?  What do people think?
>
> >  So, what do people think?
>
> Sounds like a good idea (the Machu Picchu session I mean, as I'm now
> going to insist on calling it).
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>