[LRUG] London Web Week
wendy
wendy at skillsmatter.com
Fri Apr 4 09:47:32 PDT 2008
We did this on Java once, at an EJUG meeting, and had 3 different (java)
persistence solutino providers each speak for a maximum of 5 minutes and
do a demo for maximum 5 minutes, one after another and we also had
representatives of 3 further persistence frameworks in the audience. The
rest was just panel questions, answers discussions - and this was one of
the best sessions we've ever done... If anyone interested how format
worked, the podcast is here:
David Salgado wrote:
> I think it sounds really interesting. I'd certainly want to attend,
> although I don't know if I'd be up to participating!
>
>
> You'd have to be really careful about the chosen problem though, to
> ensure it was fair to all the chosen frameworks. e.g. a company
> website + intranet + wiki with signup, email password recovery and
> roles-based access control including delegation takes about half an
> hour to setup using Plone. I'm sure other frameworks have other
> strengths, of course.
>
>
> Also, you'd have to think about what you would allow in terms of
> scaffolds/templates/plugins. If it was a social networking problem,
> would the rails team be allowed to start from http://lovdbyless.com/
> (and the equivalent with other frameworks).
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
> David
>
>
> On 03/04/2008, *Murray Steele* <murray.steele at gmail.com
> <mailto:murray.steele at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It's been announced: http://www.londonwebweek.co.uk/
>
> Whilst doing the dishes (I'm so rock and roll) I had an idea for
> an event that might fit in with LWW. I freely admit that it might
> be awful or overly complex but please bear with me.
>
> Web Framework Code-off!
>
> There are loads of web frameworks, and we'd all like to know what
> the differences are between them so we can choose which one to use
> in our next app. So the simplest solution to this would be to
> have someone talk about each one. Taking it a little bit further,
> seeing a real app built with each framework would be nice. Of
> course, seeing the *same* app built with each framework would be
> even better.
>
> I imagine something like this: teams of 4 would pick a web
> framework and register their participation (so we don't have
> everyone using the same framework). On a Friday afternoon
> (probably the weekend before the first weekend of LWW) the web app
> to be built would be announced and come the following Monday
> afternoon the teams would submit their code. The code would be
> made available online for perusal and at some point later during
> LWW all the teams would get together and talk about their chosen
> frameworks in them context of their solution.
>
> Note - there's nothing about this idea that demands the frameworks
> be ruby-based. We could easily open this up to involve the other
> language user groups.
>
> Does this even sound remotely like a thing people would want to
> participate in or attend?
>
> Muz
>
>
> On 30/03/2008, *Murray Steele* <murray.steele at gmail.com
> <mailto:murray.steele at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Patrick Griffiths has been in touch with me asking if LRUG
> would like to host an event during London Web Week. In his
> words LWW is:
>
> a collection of events that will be taking place between
> the 26th May and 1st June this year.
>
> The line-up so far includes BarCamp, @media 2008, a WSG
> evening event, a microformats/semantics evening event, a
> conference for web design beginners, and several purely
> social events/parties.
>
> The idea is that the whole is greater than the sum of its
> parts, that each event within London Web Week will gain
> wider exposure, and hopefully web design and development
> (and best practices within them) will also gain wider
> exposure in themselves.
>
>
> It sounded pretty good and couldn't hurt for us to be involved
> in some way, so I got some more info about what kind of event
> he'd like us to organise:
>
> the idea was for each event to be autonomous and to run as
> they
> would normally, so, in your case, the usual thing -
> something for the
> Ruby community rather than making a special effort to
> attract people to
> it (not that that couldn't be achieved too, of course).
>
> There will be lots of different events going on, so
> hopefully there will
> be things to appeal to people from lots of different
> backgrounds, but I
> think if we attempt to make all events all things to all
> people, it
> would probably be a mistake.
>
>
> I would suggest Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday evening.
> There are other
> events happening these evenings, but not ones that would
> have too much
> crossover (mostly being front-end development related).
>
>
> So, first things to note are that this week doesn't fall into
> our 2nd Monday of the month routine, in fact it's right slap
> in the middle of our usual schedule. So one of our normal
> meetings won't naturally fall during LWW, so we'll have to
> think about an event to put on (if we want to). The second
> thing to note is that there's the potential for lots of folk
> to be away that week as the Monday is a bank holiday and
> RailsConf USA & Caboose Conf start on the Thursday.
>
> Options obvious to me (and feel free to suggest others) are:
>
> 1. Move the May or June meetings into this week and run them
> as normal (if slightly out of usual routine)
> 2. Hold a special one-off meeting similar to our normal meetings
> 3. Organise an LRUG Nights
> 4. Organise some kind of LRUG Nights / normal meeting
> crossover event - in a pub, mostly agenda free, but we perhaps
> try to book space in a pub (maybe even one with AV equipment)
> so that short presentations or demos can happen if folk want.
> 5. Do the pub quiz that Tom has lying about.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts? Patrick is announcing LWW on
> Wednesday and he thought it'd be quite nice if he could at
> least put "LRUG will do something on Xday evening during LWW"
> in the announcement. Option 3 seems like the easiest to
> commit to, but it could easily be "upgraded" to one of the
> other options as we see fit.
>
> Muz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org <mailto:Chat at lists.lrug.org>
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
More information about the Chat
mailing list