[LRUG] Rails Cities

[Daniel Tenner]

Well, at the very least, there's nothing wrong with recommending  
people that you've actually met, since that's one of the  
recommendation criteria!

Recommending people you've never met or interacted with in any way is  
perhaps on the wrong side of the "gaming" thing though :-)

As a simpler method of cheating, we could just ask Martin to put in a  
hack that makes it so London always comes up tops in RailsCities ;-)

Daniel

On 10 Jun 2008, at 11:4110 Jun 2008, Murray Steele wrote:

> Last night, via prompting from Martin Sadler, I mentioned http://railscities.com/ 
>  at the end of the meeting.  In the pub most people said I should  
> repeat it on the list as no-one took much note of the specifics in  
> the mad dash to get outside and grab a cooling pint.
>
> Rails Citites pulls the list of the top 100 most popular rails  
> coders from Working With Rails (http://www.workingwithrails.com/browse/popular/people 
> ) and then collates the cities these top 100 work in and ranks them  
> in order of the cities with the most programmers.  Currently London  
> is 3rd, which is a shocking state of affairs as far as I'm  
> concerned.  To beat Sanfrancisco (currently 2nd with 7 folk), we  
> only need 8 folk in the top 100 and we already have 6 and to beat  
> Jacksonville we need 10 folk to beat their 9.  This shouldn't be too  
> hard, there are regularly more than 80 people at our meetings,  
> surely at least 10 of us are good enough to be in the top 100.
>
> I went and wrote an hpricot script to:
>
> a) find the lower threshold for the top 100,
> b) find everyone that claims to be from London,
> c) find their recommendation count,
> d) spit out a list of those close to the threshold that we should  
> vote for.
>
> I ran this script this morning and these are my findings:
>
> The current threshold for the top 100 is 28 recommendations, and it  
> seems to move quickly as last week it when I originally wrote the  
> script it was only 25.  So we have to give people enough  
> recommendations to ensure them a long stay in the top 100.
>
> Already in top 100:
>
> Pratik Naik (76 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5424-pratik-naik
> Dan Web (55 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5127-dan-webb
> Luke Redpath (44 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5150-luke-redpath
> James Adam (31 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5137-james-adam
> Danilo Sato (30 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7530-danilo-sato
> Martin Sadler (29 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5152-martin-sadler
>
> Close to top 100:
>
> Rob McKinnon (24 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5876-rob-mckinnon
> James Cox (23 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7223-james-cox
> Carlos Villela (21 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/6751-carlos-villela
>
> Less close to top 100:
>
> Murray Steele (17 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5430-murray-steele
> Damien Tanner (13 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/8154-damien-tanner
> Tom Ward (12 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5173-tom-ward
> Jonathan Conway (11 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5146-jonathan-conway
> James Darling (10 recs) - http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5443-james-darling
>
> There's then a serious long tail of us Londoners with <10  
> recommendations (there's 217 in the list total), but I figured that  
> 10 should be the lower bound or this email would be even more  
> needlessly long.
>
> There's an angel on my left shoulder saying; "Don't try to game the  
> system, just go to WWR and recommend people you actually have worked  
> with / used code by / seen present / read blogs of / etc... People  
> that you really do think are good developers.  Everything should  
> work out for the best if we do it naturally.  And you know what?   
> Being the 3rd best city for rails programmers isn't so bad, we're  
> still beating Chicago!"
>
> There is however a much louder devil on my right shoulder saying;  
> "Screw that, game the system.  We must be at the top of this ranking  
> on the internet! You've already written the script to get the data,  
> might as well use it!"
>
> I'm undecided as of yet, maybe you lot aren't.
>
> Muz
>
> ps.  There's also http://railscompanies.com/ too.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20080610/9a100433/attachment-0003.html>