[LRUG] ActiveMQ advice?

[Paul Battley]

2008/5/30 Paul Battley <pbattley at gmail.com>:
> Ironically, ActiveMQ's persistent messaging lost us far more messages
> than beanstalkd ever has. beanstalkd may not be persistent, but it
> does actually work, and that counts for a lot.

In the interests of science, I must point out that we didn't ever try
non-persistent messaging in ActiveMQ; that might work better.

Paul.