[LRUG] ActiveMQ advice?

[Romain Eude]

We used for a while with STOMP but it was not stable enough (stale after a while, messages not processed).
We dumped it and redesign the app to use a Merb as a near-asynchronous request broker.
Since then, no pb on that side of things.

Romain.



-----Original Message-----
From: chat-bounces at lists.lrug.org [mailto:chat-bounces at lists.lrug.org] On Behalf Of David Salgado
Sent: 30 May 2008 09:24
To: London Ruby Users Group
Subject: [LRUG] ActiveMQ advice?

Hi All

I'm considering using <a
href="http://activemq.apache.org/">ActiveMQ</a> as the message bus in a high-performance Ruby/Rails messaging app.

I've looked at Starling+Workling as another option, but I'm just not sure I trust them enough in terms of performance and reliability.
Perhaps naively, I've got more faith in apache projects, in those areas.

Has anyone else used ActiveMQ, Starling/Workling or other message queues, and have any war stories to share?

Cheers

David
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
Chat at lists.lrug.org
http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org

Romain Eude
Lead Developer

Touch Local
89 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7TP, UK
D: 020 7840 4335
E: romain.eude at touchlocal.com
T: 020 7840 4300
F: 020 7840 4301 

This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by calling 020 7840 4300 or email postmaster at touchlocal.com. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Touch Local Ltd cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and are not made on behalf of the firm.
Registered in England and Wales. Registration Number: 2885607 VAT Number: GB896112114

Help to save some trees. Print e-mails only if you really need to.