[LRUG] Expected response to be a <:redirect>, but was <200> when using should_redirect_to

[Riccardo Tacconi]

Yes,

That is the order I use. But @response is still nil. I implemented the same
test inside a standard Unit::Test and it worked without any error.

On 27 July 2010 15:25, Mr Jaba <the.jaba at gmail.com> wrote:

> So it should look something like:
>
> http://gist.github.com/492284
>
>
> On 27 July 2010 15:22, Riccardo Tacconi <rtacconi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I already tried that and I get
>>
>> NoMethodError: undefined method `body' for nil:NilClass
>>
>> Two days trying to solve this :-(
>>
>>
>> On 27 July 2010 14:58, Mr Jaba <the.jaba at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tim has hit the nail on the head there, there will be no response.body
>>> either @response or app.response until you have made the request (the delete
>>> line).
>>> Move the put down after the delete and try again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2010 14:56, Tim Cowlishaw <tim at timcowlishaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Jul 2010, at 14:43, Riccardo Tacconi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 27 July 2010 13:21, Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     should "delete :destroy participations" do
>>>>>        app = ApplicationController.new
>>>>>       puts app.response.body
>>>>>       assert_difference('Participation.count', -1) do
>>>>>         delete :destroy, :id => @p.to_param
>>>>>       end
>>>>>     end
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> *Ok, but it does not print anything*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To caveat, I'm not massively familiar with either Test::Unit or Shoulda,
>>>> but I can't quite see what this ApplicationController instance you're
>>>> creating has to do with the request that your test is making. if you look in
>>>> the testing guide:
>>>> http://guides.rubyonrails.org/testing.html#functional-tests-for-your-controllers,
>>>> you'll see that the request methods (like delete in your code) populate an
>>>> instance variable called @response with the response of the request. try
>>>> inspecting the body of this object in order to see what the response of your
>>>> request was.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chat mailing list
>>>> Chat at lists.lrug.org
>>>> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chat mailing list
>>> Chat at lists.lrug.org
>>> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Riccardo Tacconi
>> Web developer at Wolseley UK
>>
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardotacconi
>> http://riccardotacconi.blogspot.com/
>> http://twitter.com/rtacconi
>> Linux user: #400461
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chat mailing list
>> Chat at lists.lrug.org
>> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>


-- 
Riccardo Tacconi
Web developer at Wolseley UK

http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardotacconi
http://riccardotacconi.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/rtacconi
Linux user: #400461
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20100727/76d9fd95/attachment-0003.html>