[LRUG] Talk offer: An interpreter written in Ruby

[Roland Swingler]

Hi,

I'd be interested in this, especially if you stick to "I wouldn't
propose really talking about the parsing": getting to an AST seems
quite easy - actually doing something with it afterwards less so (at
least for me), so it would be good to be enlightened.

R

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Tom ten Thij <mail at tomtenthij.nl> wrote:
>> The point is that it's an interpreter written in a very high-level language, which I think it relatively easy to understand.
>
> I had a bit of a deja vu to this meeting:
> http://lrug.org/meetings/2009/05/05/may-2009-meeting/
> But it could still be very interesting to hear about your approach.
>
> Tom.
>
> -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
>  Tom ten Thij
>  Unboxed Consulting, http://unboxedconsulting.com
>  T: +44 20 3137 2943 F: +44 20 7183 4251
> -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>