[LRUG] A talk request [was: A talk suggestion]

[Murray Steele]

The July meeting is on the 12th so I need to get some speakers sorted out
for it.  Are there any talkers for what I describe below?  We'd probably
need about 5 or 6 of you to make this a worthwhile event.  If no-one's into
it I'll start looking for some other speakers, so if you have a talk idea
along these lines (or anything else) do get in touch.

Muz

On 22 June 2010 14:38, Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:

> In a secret backroom deal I have secured The Tim C and Chris O show for the
> August meeting*.  Which brings me swiftly on to the July meeting.  Anyone
> got any ideas?
>
> I have one, but it requires a bunch of short talks, if anyone's interested.
>  The idea is that:
>
> 1. You go watch Ben Griffiths' "Short Order Ruby" talk from Ruby Manor:
> http://rubymanor.org/harder/videos/short_order_ruby/
> 2. You realise that:
>    a) you have a few little ruby scripts in this sort of short scrappy
> style
>    b) you are secretly proud of them and want to show them off
>    c) but you haven't put them on public source control to share them
> because they're full of passwords and private keys for ssh or apis
> 3. You come to LRUG in July (or some other month) and talk about one of
> them
>
> I think this could be fun, and I'm sure there'd be lots of variety in the
> kinds of scripts we'd be seeing.  We could probably aim for 5 or 6 speakers
> to fill the evening if people talk for 5-10 minutes each.
>
> Also, if no-one is into that idea, or not prepared to make a whole meeting
> out of it for July, I recall that Anthony Green suggested a LinkedData in
> Ruby evening.  Anyone got any contacts I could chase up about sorting that
> out, or pointers to the kind of LinkedData stuff they'd like to hear about?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Muz
>
> * No secrets really, they just want some more time to finesse their ideas
> and make the talk really sweeeeet.
>
> On 22 June 2010 12:46, Tim Cowlishaw <tim at timcowlishaw.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 Jun 2010, at 12:40, Roland Swingler wrote:
>>
>> > Yes sounds good. Be interesting to hear how you dealt with really
>> > tightly coupled code leading to massive test setups if you faced that
>> > problem.
>>
>> Heh... This is definitely one of our current bugbears - there's a
>> ridiculous amount of setup and teardown involved in many of our specs, for
>> precisely this reason. However, I'm not convinced it's a problem we've
>> solved yet. Hopefully we'll make some progress though :-)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chat mailing list
>> Chat at lists.lrug.org
>> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20100629/b4aeff40/attachment-0003.html>