[LRUG] For the agenda of the June meeting: a humble offering for your consideration

[Levent Ali]

Great idea

On 19 May 2010, at 13:02, jds <jds340 at gmail.com> wrote:

> go for it
>
> On 19 May 2010 08:11, Tim Benest <thb at taskforce.co.uk> wrote:
> ++1
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Jordi Noguera Leon
> <jordinoguera83 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good stuff, go for it!
> >
> > On 19 May 2010 05:07, Matthew Rudy Jacobs <matthewrudyjacobs at gmail.com 
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds really interesting.
> >> If I could be there, I'd vote for it.
> >>
> >> On 19 May 2010 04:57, Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> Just to remind you that the next meeting will be on Monday 14th  
> June.
> >>>  I'm just starting to sort out talks for it, but I wanted to  
> offer up a talk
> >>> that I'd like to give.  The talk is called "My First Ruby" and  
> in it I will
> >>> show off the first ruby script I ever wrote.
> >>> I think you might enjoy this because:
> >>> 1. It's a mailing list with a web front-end.  The web stuff is  
> pre-rails
> >>> and I think it's interesting in terms of "look how far we've  
> come".
> >>>  Seriously, if you've never done web development without a  
> higher-level
> >>> framework like rails you'll be amazed.  (For anyone who's heard  
> of it, it
> >>> uses NARF).
> >>> 2. I can pretty much guarantee* that my first ruby code is worse  
> than
> >>> your first ruby code.  So for any newbies in the room, it should  
> come as
> >>> welcome relief that even apparent old-hands like myself have  
> written
> >>> terrible code (and it truly is terrible code), made terrible  
> design
> >>> decisions, and done both without the safety net of TDD.  Of  
> course,
> >>> hopefully in the talk I'll point out why, if writing this again,  
> I would use
> >>> TDD.  At the end I hope this talk will make people feel less  
> embarrassed
> >>> about showing off code of their own at future events; I'll be  
> setting a
> >>> base-level of awfulness.
> >>> 3. This bit of software was written in a weekend and has been in
> >>> "production" for  7 years 11 months (according to the date I  
> filled in for
> >>> "when I first started using Ruby" on my Working With Rails  
> profile) and it's
> >>> been remarkably stable and unchanged for those 7 years.  I've no  
> real
> >>> evidence for this, but it's a scientific fact that it's the  
> longest running
> >>> piece of ruby software in the world... wouldn't you like to see  
> inside it?
> >>> So, can I give it?
> >>> Muz
> >>>
> >>> * not a guarantee**
> >>> ** it is a bit
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Chat mailing list
> >>> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> >>> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Chat mailing list
> >> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> >> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > Chat at lists.lrug.org
> > http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20100519/39c9f18d/attachment-0003.html>