[LRUG] Job Emails

[Roland Swingler]

Same +1's here.

A jobs tag makes it easier to find those posts as much as filter them out.

I also support naming the company - it will help prevent a deluge of
recruiter spam, and I suspect most people on this list care very much
about the specific environment they will be working in, which is
effectively impossible to determine if you don't know who the company
is.

Roland

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Chris Parsons <chris.p at rsons.org> wrote:
> +1 to [JOBS]
> +1 for recruiters to have to name the company they're recruiting for.
>
> Chris
>
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 13:31, Jon Wood wrote:
>
> Personally I think that's a bit sweeping, but it should be a requirement to
> mention the company you're recruiting for. I have no interest in ads for "a
> startup using Ruby".
>
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 13:20, David Salgado <david at digitalronin.com> wrote:
>
> On 18 January 2012 13:15, Adam Carlile <adam at benchmedia.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I don't mind people in the community posting direct
>
> vacancies for the talented people of el' rug, but I dislike recruitment
>
> agents using it as a tool…
>
>
> Absolutely. I'd go further and just say let's ban recruiters as soon
>
> as they're detected.
>
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Chat mailing list
>
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
>
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>
> --
> Chris Parsons
> chris.p at rsons.org
> http://twitter.com/chrismdp
> http://pa.rsons.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>