[LRUG] Writing readable feature tests with RSpec

[Sleepyfox]

There is a difference between knowing and understanding. As Anthony says,
there's a lot more to this stuff than maths (as much as we owe to E.J.
Dijkstra for making it clear that software is indeed, on some level,
mathematics).

The longer I work in software, the more my horizon has expanded from me and
my competencies, my team and what they do, the broader organisation, the
customer, to the community/ecosystem. Many of you here are familiar with
this journey yourselves, and aware of it at a conscious level.

Also as my journey expands my horizon outwards, there is another
simultaneous but separate journey that expands my horizon *inwards*...

Fox
--
"What does the @sleepyfox say?"



On 29 July 2014 10:36, Anthony Green <anthony.charles.green at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 29 Jul 2014, at 10:22, Tom Stuart <tom at codon.com> wrote:
>
> A meta-point: this is one of the things that frustrates me about
> conversations on these topics
>
>
> Cultural exchanges are complex; we only have theories regarding the
> mechanics.
>
> see also: cultural and social anthropology, phenomenology, ontology and
> epistemology
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> Archives: http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org
> Manage your subscription: http://lists.lrug.org/options.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> List info: http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20140729/6d519853/attachment.html>