[LRUG] A follow up RSpec talk

[David Waller]

I should have replied a week ago, but I'm one person who would be interested.  Both from the point of view of the tests I write and the nuts-and-bolts of how to implement composable things effectively.  

David



>________________________________
> From: Sam Phippen <samphippen at googlemail.com>
>To: chat at lists.lrug.org 
>Sent: Tuesday, 15 July 2014, 21:43
>Subject: [LRUG] A follow up RSpec talk
> 
>
>Hello Everyone,
>
>Firstly, I’d like to say a huge thanks to Tom for his talk last night. I thought it was great, and it accurately captured many of my feels as RSpec. It was also nice to hear that the hard work we put in is appreciated. 
>
>Tom mentioned that he didn’t have time to talk about at least two RSpec 3 features that I think are *very* important: composable matchers and verifying doubles. I’m wondering if there’s any interest in the community in having another RSpec talk which covers in detail important new features and removed features in RSpec 3. If there is, please do let me know and I’ll talk to Murray about when the next slot is :)
>
>Thanks
>—
>Sam Phippen
>_______________________________________________
>Chat mailing list
>Chat at lists.lrug.org
>Archives: http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org
>Manage your subscription: http://lists.lrug.org/options.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>List info: http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20140722/5d07a3ec/attachment-0003.html>