[LRUG] Field definitions in AR models

Thomas Buckley-Houston tom at tombh.co.uk
Thu Feb 19 01:27:39 PST 2015


Thanks Frederick Cheung. Your answer has made the most sense to me. I
can see why model fields were sacrificed now.

Just thinking out loud, but it wouldn't be the worst case of foregoing
DRY if fields were in the model *and* the DB. It reminds me of C's
header files, there's something polite and hospitable about having a
snapshot overview of what is 'hidden underneath'.



More information about the Chat mailing list