[LRUG] Code quality 2.5-question survey: the results

[Sam Livingston-Gray]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Sleepyfox <sleepyfox at gmail.com> wrote:

> it's highly likely (based upon my and others' experience) that the

majority of code bases are indeed 'bad'.
>

This conforms to my experience; I've seen a decent range of apps ranging
from "rather acceptable" to "uh, let's talk" (the median) all the way down
to "...I have no words for this."  See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20160913/6c1e9ab6/attachment-0002.html>