London is currently 2nd with an equal number of rails programmers to Jacksonville.<div><br><div>Murray and James Darling are very close to the top 100.<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Murray Steele <<a href="mailto:murray.steele@gmail.com">murray.steele@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Last night, via prompting from Martin Sadler, I mentioned <a href="http://railscities.com/" target="_blank">http://railscities.com/</a> at the end of the meeting. In the pub most people said I should repeat it on the list as no-one took much note of the specifics in the mad dash to get outside and grab a cooling pint.<br>
<br>Rails Citites pulls the list of the top 100 most popular rails coders from Working With Rails (<a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/browse/popular/people" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/browse/popular/people</a>) and then collates the cities these top 100 work in and ranks them in order of the cities with the most programmers. Currently London is 3rd, which is a shocking state of affairs as far as I'm concerned. To beat Sanfrancisco (currently 2nd with 7 folk), we only need 8 folk in the top 100 and we already
have 6 and to beat Jacksonville we need 10 folk to beat their 9. This shouldn't be too hard, there are regularly more than 80 people at our meetings, surely at least 10 of us are good enough to be in the top 100.<br>
<br>I went and wrote an hpricot script to: <br><br>a) find the lower threshold for the top 100, <br>b) find everyone that claims to be from London,<br>c) find their recommendation count,<br>d) spit out a list of those close to the threshold that we should vote for.<br>
<br>I ran this script this morning and these are my findings: <br><br>The current threshold for the top 100 is 28 recommendations, and it seems to move quickly as last week it when I originally wrote the script it was only 25. So we have to give people enough recommendations to ensure them a long stay in the top 100.<br>
<br>Already in top 100:<br><br>Pratik Naik (76 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5424-pratik-naik" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5424-pratik-naik</a><br>Dan Web (55 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5127-dan-webb" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5127-dan-webb</a><br>
Luke Redpath (44 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5150-luke-redpath" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5150-luke-redpath</a><br>James Adam (31 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5137-james-adam" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5137-james-adam</a><br>
Danilo Sato (30 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7530-danilo-sato" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7530-danilo-sato</a><br>Martin Sadler (29 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5152-martin-sadler" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5152-martin-sadler</a><br>
<br>Close to top 100:<br><br>Rob McKinnon (24 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5876-rob-mckinnon" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5876-rob-mckinnon</a><br>James Cox (23 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7223-james-cox" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/7223-james-cox</a><br>
Carlos Villela (21 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/6751-carlos-villela" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/6751-carlos-villela</a><br><br>Less close to top 100:<br><br>Murray Steele (17 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5430-murray-steele" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5430-murray-steele</a><br>
Damien Tanner (13 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/8154-damien-tanner" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/8154-damien-tanner</a><br>
Tom Ward (12 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5173-tom-ward" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5173-tom-ward</a><br>Jonathan Conway (11 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5146-jonathan-conway" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5146-jonathan-conway</a><br>
James Darling (10 recs) - <a href="http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5443-james-darling" target="_blank">http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/5443-james-darling</a><br><br>There's then a serious long tail of us Londoners with <10 recommendations (there's 217 in the list total), but I figured that 10 should be the lower bound or this email would be even more needlessly long.<br>
<br>There's an angel on my left shoulder saying; "Don't try to game the system, just go to WWR and recommend people you actually have worked with / used code by / seen present / read blogs of / etc... People that you really do think are good developers. Everything should work out for the best if we do it naturally. And you know what? Being the 3rd best city for rails programmers isn't so bad, we're still beating Chicago!"<br>
<br>There is however a much louder devil on my right shoulder saying; "Screw that, game the system. We must be at the top of this ranking on the internet! You've already written the script to get the data, might as well use it!"<br>
<br>I'm undecided as of yet, maybe you lot aren't.<br><br>Muz<br><br>ps. There's also <a href="http://railscompanies.com/" target="_blank">http://railscompanies.com/</a> too.<br><br><br><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Chat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Chat@lists.lrug.org">Chat@lists.lrug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org" target="_blank">http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://snowblink.co.uk/">http://snowblink.co.uk/</a>
</div></div></div>