<div class="gmail_quote">On 13 March 2012 00:15, Anthony Green <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anthony.green@bbc.co.uk">anthony.green@bbc.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Links to further reading to some of the topics that were touched on tonight:<br>
<br>
Pretotyping<br>
-----------<br>
<a href="http://www.pretotyping.org" target="_blank">http://www.pretotyping.org</a><br>
<br>
Programmer Anarchy<br>
------------------<br>
<a href="http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Leaner-Programmer-Anarchy" target="_blank">http://www.infoq.com/<u></u>presentations/Leaner-<u></u>Programmer-Anarchy</a><br>
<br>
Growing Object Orientated Software Guided By Tests<br>
------------------------------<u></u>--------------------<br>
<a href="http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com" target="_blank">http://www.growing-object-<u></u>oriented-software.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.natpryce.com/articles.html" target="_blank">http://www.natpryce.com/<u></u>articles.html</a><br>
<br>
Behaviour Driven Development<br>
----------------------------<br>
Liz Keogh's definitive guide:<br>
<a href="http://www.slideshare.net/lunivore/behavior-driven-development-11754474" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/<u></u>lunivore/behavior-driven-<u></u>development-11754474</a><br>
<br>
and writing about Chris Matts' notion of feature injection:<br>
<a href="http://www.infoq.com/articles/pulling-power" target="_blank">http://www.infoq.com/articles/<u></u>pulling-power</a><br>
<br>
JB Rainsberger on how to split features<br>
<a href="http://www.jbrains.ca/permalink/how-youll-probably-learn-to-split-features" target="_blank">http://www.jbrains.ca/<u></u>permalink/how-youll-probably-<u></u>learn-to-split-features</a><br>
<br>
Modular Design<br>
--------------<br>
or how a solid code base can be arrived through design principles and judicious refactoring as Marcus pointed out<br>
<a href="http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2011/05/11/xp-2011-j-b-rainsberger-a-simple-approach-to-modular-design" target="_blank">http://www.markhneedham.com/<u></u>blog/2011/05/11/xp-2011-j-b-<u></u>rainsberger-a-simple-approach-<u></u>to-modular-design</a><br>

<br>
<br>
TDDing Spikes Away<br>
------------------<br>
<a href="https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/screencasts/catalog/tdding-spikes-away-with-rebase" target="_blank">https://www.<u></u>destroyallsoftware.com/<u></u>screencasts/catalog/tdding-<u></u>spikes-away-with-rebase</a><br>

<br>
<br>
Evaluating Customer Delight<br>
---------------------------<br>
<a href="http://www.energizedwork.com/weblog/2012/02/stop-pushing-features-and-start-delighting-users" target="_blank">http://www.energizedwork.com/<u></u>weblog/2012/02/stop-pushing-<u></u>features-and-start-delighting-<u></u>users</a><br>

<br>
<a href="http://www.energizedwork.com/weblog/2012/02/measuring-purpose-measuring-customer-delight" target="_blank">http://www.energizedwork.com/<u></u>weblog/2012/02/measuring-<u></u>purpose-measuring-customer-<u></u>delight</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>

<br>
<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Towards the end of the panel, Alex Speller (I think) mentioned a lack of empirical evidence about TDD and development methodologies in general.  I remember watching a talk about exactly this kind of thing late last year, but for the life of me I can't find the link (Chrome doesn't seem to have any of my browser history before the start of Jan).  I did a quick scan of Confreaks and InfoQ and a cursory google search, but nothing seems to ring a bell.  Chances are that it was a link I followed from a tweet by someone on here, so I'm hoping someone else remembers it and can dig up the link.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Anyway, the point is that there is research in this area, I just don't think it's widely publicised, or particularly mature as a field.</div><div><br></div><div>Muz</div></div>