<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div><br>On 10 Oct 2012, at 23:53, Gerhard Lazu <<a href="mailto:gerhard@lazu.co.uk">gerhard@lazu.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">bsdm[1] style ?</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">Fred</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">[1]:</span><a href="https://bdsm.beginrescueend.com/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif" target="_blank">https://bdsm.beginrescueend.com</a></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>It does have some resemblance to sm - in particular the modular structure - but it's far more lightweight and very straightforward. Simple always wins in my books.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sounds interesting. Hopefully with a name that is easier to google for than bdsm!</div><div><br></div><div>Fred</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">This sounds really interesting. I'm less and less fond of the complex</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">and over-engineered Ruby development and infrastructure tools that</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">seem to have proliferated lately, and more keen on mature software</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">that works just as well.</span> </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Paul</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It all started with a very simple question: "If I had to deploy this app manually, what commands would I run?". From there, I was able to come up with a single utility that worked just the same for legacy PHP systems, Ruby services (from EM daemons to Rails), node.js hipsterisms and even statically generated sites. When I wanted to notify New Relic of new deployments, it took me 5 minutes to implement (where 4 minutes was reading their documentation).</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Chat mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Chat@lists.lrug.org">Chat@lists.lrug.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org">http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>