<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Sleepyfox <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sleepyfox@gmail.com" target="_blank">sleepyfox@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">it's highly likely (based upon my and others' experience) that the </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">majority of code bases are indeed 'bad'.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This conforms to my experience; I've seen a decent range of apps ranging from "rather acceptable" to "uh, let's talk" (the median) all the way down to "...I have no words for this."  See also:  <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law</a> </div></div></div></div>