[LRUG] Stealth Group!?

[Tom Armitage]

I really don't know why I bothered, though, given all the flak I got  
for it... I get the feeling I was slightly grumpy at work and  
misphrased some things. As a result, all hell came down, etc.

t.


On 27 Oct 2006, at 10:55, Robert McKinnon wrote:

> Thanks for the heads up Murray. And thanks Tom for defending our  
> little
> group's honour. While we were in stealth mode last year when we didn't
> have space capacity for large meetings, definitely this year we've  
> been
> as open as possible, with the exception of posting to the ruby-talk
> list.
>
> I'll rectify that now. ;)
>
> cheers,
> Rob
>
> --- Murray Steele <murray.steele at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone following the "Chunky Bacon" / "Potential Brit ruby meeting
>> formally Chunky Bacon" threads on ruby-talk? They are being all mean
>> about LRUG being a "stealth" group (relevant bit from ruby-forum:
>> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/86060).  Tom has been kind enough to
>> jump in and defend the LRUG honour, but one message in particular (
>> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/86060#159196) got me thinking.
>>
>> Perhaps in the interest of un-stealthing we should send out [ANN]
>> messages for LRUG meetings to the ruby-talk list?  Every other RUG
>> seems to do it (and some even seem to use ruby-talk as their own
>> chat at lrug.org style list)
>> so it's not like we'd be out of place.
>>
>> Muz
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> chat mailing list
> chat at lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org


---
Tom Armitage
tom at infovore.org
07813 060578