[LRUG] November talk proposal

Frederick Cheung frederick.cheung at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 23:06:21 PDT 2012



On 10 Oct 2012, at 23:53, Gerhard Lazu <gerhard at lazu.co.uk> wrote:

>> bsdm[1] style ?
>> Fred
>> [1]:https://bdsm.beginrescueend.com
> 
> It does have some resemblance to sm - in particular the modular structure - but it's far more lightweight and very straightforward. Simple always wins in my books.

Sounds interesting. Hopefully with a name that is easier to google for than bdsm!

Fred



> 
>> This sounds really interesting. I'm less and less fond of the complex
>> and over-engineered Ruby development and infrastructure tools that
>> seem to have proliferated lately, and more keen on mature software
>> that works just as well. 
>> Paul
> 
> It all started with a very simple question: "If I had to deploy this app manually, what commands would I run?". From there, I was able to come up with a single utility that worked just the same for legacy PHP systems, Ruby services (from EM daemons to Rails), node.js hipsterisms and even statically generated sites. When I wanted to notify New Relic of new deployments, it took me 5 minutes to implement (where 4 minutes was reading their documentation).
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20121011/17393f26/attachment.html>


More information about the Chat mailing list