[LRUG] Dependency Injection and DHH

[Stephen Henderson]

I was wondering if he would take the bait :) That one's actually a response to an earlier blog post DHH made about tdd in general, but it’s all related: http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-live-testing.html

Bob Martin’s followup article is also very good: http://blog.8thlight.com/uncle-bob/2014/04/30/When-tdd-does-not-work.html

Stephen

From: Sasha Gerrand <chat-lists.lrug.org at sgerrand.com<mailto:chat-lists.lrug.org at sgerrand.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 16:39
To: London Ruby Users Group <chat at lists.lrug.org<mailto:chat at lists.lrug.org>>
Subject: Re: [LRUG] Dependency Injection and DHH


On 30 April 2014 15:12, Stephen Henderson <stephen at cognitivematch.com<mailto:stephen at cognitivematch.com>> wrote:
DHH has done a blog post which explains a bit better his argument that TDD/DI can make code worse: http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/test-induced-design-damage.html

<snip>

If you haven't already, I'd also recommend reading Bob Martin<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Cecil_Martin>'s response to the DHH blog post: http://blog.8thlight.com/uncle-bob/2014/04/25/MonogamousTDD.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20140430/dd33bb14/attachment-0003.html>