[LRUG] resolving JS dependencies on deploy

[Mark Burns]

Paul you are right, it's late where I am now and I'm on mobile. I will give
some more useful input tomorrow.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:26 AM Paul Battley <pbattley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 November 2015 at 16:13, Mark Burns <markthedeveloper at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > IMHO the tooling around the node ecosystem feels a lot more modern and
> > suited to the task than the cludgy asset pipeline.
> > Things like webpack, ES6, requirejs etc are fantastic for modern js
> > development.
>
> This all seems a bit woolly - "more modern" and "fantastic" vs
> "cludgy" - but it doesn't tell me very much. Specifically, what makes
> it better? What cludginess can we avoid?
>
> Ripping out and replacing a (mostly) working system is a significant
> undertaking, but if there are significant tangible benefits it would
> be really useful to know what they are.
>
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at lists.lrug.org
> Archives: http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org
> Manage your subscription: http://lists.lrug.org/options.cgi/chat-lrug.org
> List info: http://lists.lrug.org/listinfo.cgi/chat-lrug.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/attachments/20151119/4f0e6e56/attachment-0002.html>